Okay I have a question for everybody. During the show after Buffy's mother died she had to try and find a way to pay her bills. However, what I don't understand is that during the season Buffy died the Watchers Council came in to test them and if you remember the show she told them at the end she would let them back in if they did what she wanted. One of the things that they had to do was reinstate Giles at full salary retroactive. So if he got a salary why didn't Buffy?
-
Re: Buffy and Working
Sat, July 28, 2007 - 11:26 PMUmmmm, because Buffy's position was more a volunteer position that had no pay and few benefits (she was strong like the Hulk)......
another hypothesis could be that it was because she was a woman.....just throwing that out there. -
-
Re: Buffy and Working
Sat, September 15, 2007 - 7:22 PMLOL at Stonecutter Steve!
-
-
Re: Buffy and Working
Sat, July 28, 2007 - 11:53 PMI agree that this is a curious plot inconsistency. Giles speaks in several episodes of Watching being a calling and one which he was not initially pleased to be chosen for, so why pay him and not her, or rather and not the slayer? My guess would be that ordinarily all a slayer need do is ask and she would be able to procure funds from the council at any time for almost any need but as Buffy's relationship with the council was decidedly less than ideal she was not given such luxuries.
-
Re: Buffy and Working
Sun, July 29, 2007 - 12:45 AMThe Watchers are employees, the Slayers their "charges." I see it as another example of the mistreatment of the Slayers by the Council, who at best treated them as not much more than userful tools. I could see them, in some cultures where it is apparently more open (like Kendra's), compesating PARENTS for the loss of their daughters (who are sent to training as Potentials), but not the Slayers or Potentials themselves. I doubt that the Slayers actually being paid would have ever occurred to them.
That being said, why Buffy didn't say "you know, this policy of not paying the Slayer sucks and I'm not working with you until I see some cold hard cash myself" is a good question though. -
-
Re: Buffy and Working
Mon, August 6, 2007 - 4:57 PMthanks for the responses. I accidentally posted this twice because the first time it didn't look like my computer connected so I redid the post. I guess it went through the first time. Sorry -
-
Re: Buffy and Working
Fri, August 10, 2007 - 11:07 PMI think it's less a function of gender than age. Slayers are called young and generally die young. I think it is assumed that a slayer is under the (patriarchal and parental) care of her watcher, thus he is expected to take care of her financial support (which brings up more interesting questions about Wood's mother, aka the Subway Slayer). This is probably why Buffy was willing to accept financial support so readily from Giles when things fell apart. It is certainly a way of exerting control over a slayer.
I think not demanding payment from the Council is part of Buffy's acceptance of Slaying not as a "job," which is how she frequently defines it in her high school years, but as a calling. Slaying is who she is, not what she does. And, as Xander points out, she's like Spiderman - action is his reward.
Of course, demanding Giles' salary was a selfless act. She rarely advocates for her own self-interest, and when she does, it generally ends badly. This is why Angel can charge people for saving people but Buffy can never quite get away with it.
And, you'll notice when she "joined" the initiative for five minutes, it didn't occur to her to ask for benefits. -
-
Re: Buffy and Working
Wed, August 15, 2007 - 7:28 PMLisa, I think you have some very good points. Thanks for responding.
-
-
-
